Legeva for governed legal work

AI legal work, governed from intake to answer

Legeva turns matters, sources, agents, review, and audit into one governed workspace for legal teams.

Governed operating model

Show the work before anyone relies on it.

Legeva is organized around the reviewable path legal teams need: request, sources, agent execution, lawyer review, audit trail, and controlled handoff.

No unsupported productivity metrics, invented customer logos, or claims that replace professional judgment.
The platform is framed for evaluation with approved materials, source boundaries, and named reviewers.

Describe task

Review the target company vendor agreements for assignment, termination, and unusual liability language.

Source scope: data room contractsOutput: diligence findings register

Agent executes

Policy bound
01

Plan

02

Retrieve

03

Prepare

Sources, unresolved assumptions, transformations, and output drafts are captured with the run.

Lawyer reviews

Accept with edits
Escalate exception
Release to matter file

01

Request intake

The task starts with matter context, desired work product, reviewer role, and excluded material.

02

Source scope

Agents work from permitted documents, knowledge, playbooks, and connected systems.

03

Agent execution

Plans, retrieval steps, drafts, assumptions, and unresolved issues remain visible.

04

Lawyer review

Counsel edits, approves, escalates, or rejects before external reliance or handoff.

05

Audit trail

Instructions, sources, draft versions, reviewer actions, and release decisions are preserved.

06

System handoff

Approved outputs can be routed to matter files, queues, exports, or connected tools.

Service architecture

Legal AI modules with controls attached.

Each service area is described by the work it performs and the proof a buyer can inspect: inputs, source grounding, reviewer status, and audit evidence.

Delegated tasks

AI legal agents

Task-specific agents prepare research, review, drafting, diligence, and operations work inside defined matter boundaries.

Instruction plans, source lists, work product, and review status stay visible.

Grounded analysis

Legal research

Research workflows assemble authorities, compare positions, surface conflicts, and prepare citations for legal review.

Every answer can show source grounding and unresolved assumptions.

Matter evidence

Document review

Review large document sets for issues, obligations, risk signals, privilege cues, and matter-specific classification.

Reviewer decisions can be captured beside model suggestions and source excerpts.

Controlled language

Drafting and redlining

Prepare first drafts, clause alternatives, redline positions, and negotiation notes from approved playbooks.

Drafts carry rationale, source references, and human approval gates.

Portfolio insight

Contract intelligence

Extract obligations, renewal terms, deviations, negotiation positions, and risk patterns from contract estates.

Structured terms can flow into reports, alerts, and downstream systems.

Transaction review

Due diligence

Accelerate diligence across contracts, corporate records, policies, financial exhibits, and disclosure schedules.

Findings can be organized by issue, document, risk level, and reviewer disposition.

Repeatable work

Workflow automation

Turn recurring legal requests into guided workflows with routing, approvals, document steps, and audit evidence.

Teams can standardize intake while keeping exceptions visible.

Institutional memory

Knowledge management

Make approved precedents, matter notes, research, policies, and playbooks usable by agents and lawyers.

Knowledge access follows the same permissions as the underlying material.

Operating view

Legal operations analytics

Track legal demand, throughput, review queues, workflow bottlenecks, and adoption signals without inventing outcomes.

Dashboards reflect actual matter activity, not unsupported productivity claims.

Existing systems

Integrations and connectors

Connect document systems, matter platforms, CLM, eDiscovery, identity, email, and knowledge repositories.

Connector policy defines what agents can read, write, summarize, or escalate.

Control plane

Security and governance

Configure access, review gates, retention, source boundaries, audit trails, and deployment policy for legal work.

Governance is visible in the workflow, not hidden in a separate console.

Buyer paths

Built for the teams that carry legal work.

The same governed model can start in a practice group, legal department, transaction team, litigation team, compliance function, or legal operations program.

Law firms

Bring research, drafting, review, and matter knowledge into one governed delivery layer.

Matter researchDraft prepReview queues

In-house legal teams

Triage requests, prepare repeatable work, and keep counsel in control of final advice.

IntakePolicy answersContract support

Litigation teams

Organize facts, evidence, authorities, and argument work around live matters.

ChronologiesAuthority mapsIssue review

Transactional and M&A teams

Review target materials, identify deviations, and prepare diligence outputs.

DiligenceRedlinesRisk registers

Compliance and regulatory teams

Monitor obligations, compare policies, and prepare evidence for control owners.

Regulatory watchPolicy reviewControl evidence

Legal operations and innovation teams

Standardize workflows, measure demand, and govern AI adoption across legal teams.

AutomationAnalyticsAdoption governance

Mid-sized firms

Adopt enterprise-grade legal AI patterns without building a large internal platform team.

Knowledge reuseClient deliveryPractice workflows

Agentic workflow

From instruction to reviewed work product.

01

Describe the legal task

A lawyer or approved team member gives the matter context, source scope, desired output, and review expectation.

02

Agent executes inside policy

Legeva plans the work, gathers permitted sources, prepares work product, and records what was used.

03

Lawyer reviews and releases

A human reviewer accepts, edits, escalates, or rejects the output with the audit trail preserved.

Governance and integration

Controls belong beside the work.

Sensitive legal work needs source permissions, review gates, matter auditability, and clear boundaries before any system updates or external use.

Permission-aware source access

Agents only operate on approved repositories, matters, and documents available to the requesting user or workflow.

Human review gates

High-impact outputs can require named reviewer approval before they leave the workspace or update a system.

Matter-level audit trails

Instructions, retrieved sources, transformations, draft versions, reviewer actions, and handoffs can be traced.

Deployment governance

Administrators can stage agents, constrain actions, define retention expectations, and monitor usage patterns.

System handoff

Fit the systems legal teams already trust.

Integrations are framed as governed read, write, summarize, escalate, or export permissions. Nothing is presented as an uncontrolled automation path.

Document management systems
Matter management
Contract lifecycle management
eDiscovery platforms
Knowledge repositories
Email and calendar
Identity and SSO
Data warehouses

Start with a governed workflow

Evaluate Legeva against the legal work your team actually performs.

Bring a representative matter, source set, or recurring workflow. Legeva can be framed around the controls and review expectations your organization needs.

Opens an email to contact@legeva.com. Include the workflow, source systems, and review expectations you want to evaluate.